Professional-life researchers have introduced they’re taking authorized motion towards Sage Journals after the writer retracted their abortion research.
The transfer comes after Sage Journals reported on Feb. 5 that pro-life authors “declared no conflicts of curiosity” in abortion research, the publication didn’t apply the identical commonplace towards research by authors affiliated with pro-abortion organizations.
Two of the retracted research analyzed emergency room visits associated to issues from the abortion drug mifepristone, and one other research concerned medical doctors performing abortions.
Charlotte Lozier Institute lead researcher and vice chairman James Studnicki advised The Faculty Repair that the analysis complies with Sage's battle of curiosity coverage. He stated the “blatant double commonplace is unacceptable”.
Articles written by pro-abortion topics and never indicating organizational affiliation weren’t retracted, the pro-life researchers stated.
“Thus far, Sage has made no legitimate objection to their findings and has proven no proof of any materials errors, miscalculations or falsehoods,” it stated.
“Our group of researchers has refuted each single criticism of the analysis, and we encourage everybody to learn the research to grasp the rationale for the methodology and our rebuttal of the criticism,” Studnicki defined in an e-mail to the outlet. “There is no such thing as a official cause for Sage's dismissal.
The Charlotte Lozier Institute is now “taking acceptable authorized motion”.
